Which Shelley Luther has actually earned your vote?
Remember Nancy Pelosi’s famously stupid comment, “… we have to pass the bill so we can find out what is in it … “?
So…If we want to know what’s hidden in Shelley Luther’s past that qualifies or disqualifies her ….”we’ll have to elect her to find out”. Déjà vu
Shelley Luther was given a $1million campaign loan to oppose Drew Springer for a Senate Seat. Is that ok as long as we believe her description of herself? We know nothing about her past behavior and her work history? All we know about Luther’s past is what she wants us to believe. No corroborating documentation is offered.
How simplistic is it to accept a $1million campaign loan and think all that money will have no influence whatsoever on her vote? Is that ok as long as we agree with the outcome?
What will be the cost of the next Texas Senate seat? Will the bidding start at $1million?
For years we have seen good people with honorable intentions allow their emotions to overpower their intellect and involve themselves in futile “anybody but” campaigns that accomplish absolutely nothing.
I am in total agreement with Rush Limbaugh when he says, “It’s not what they say, it’s what they do that matters”. We all know is what Luther ‘says’ but what has she actually ‘done’ that qualifies her to become a Texas State Senator?
Again I ask, If the issue with Drew Springer is big money influence, do we really think the solution is more big money influence?
Or, do qualifications really matter?