Election Contest Appeal Moves Forward

Thanks to our dedicated supporters, we have successfully
filed our final brief with the Third Court of Appeals


Computerized voting machines have been operating for over a decade and Texans don’t trust them–and now we know why.  Dr. Laura Pressley’s historic election contest has uncovered electronic voting machine corruption errors, security breaches, missing back up tapes and no ballot images exist for a legal recount.
Candidates all over Texas have known about these illegalities for over a decade and Pressley is the first to take the responsibility to address them in the Texas courts.

Pressley’s critical appeal and final legal brief was recently filed with the Third Court of Appeals in Travis County.  Completion of Pressley’s brief is a result of the support of so many that have spread the word, have contributed and enabled this case to move forward.  Thank you to everyone!


texas votingBreaking News for 2016 Primaries:  Similar Illegalities and serious election irregularities, that occurred in Pressley’s election, recently recurred in Texas counties during the 2016 Primaries.

Hart InterCivic electronic voting machines, used in over 100 counties in Texas, do not store ballot images as required by law for recounts,

Poll Watchers witnessed more corruption errors on main tabulation computers on election night,

Texas Secretary of State’s Election Division issued waivers for counties to not print backup/results tapes for Early Voting and Election Day before equipment left the polling places,

Secretary of State’s Election Division issued waivers to all 254 Texas counties to not audit paper ballot results,

Poll watchers were obstructed from monitoring main tabulation computers on Election Day,

A county refused to post precinct results and attempted to charge a fee for official precinct level Early and Election Day voting results as required by law, and

Votes were flipped on computer screens.


Bob Hall

State Senator Questions Election Integrity

Austin Press Release–“Texas election laws are not being followed in many counties. Without this consistency, and with the ‘it’s the way we do it’ attitude, this has greatly opened the door to fraud.”

“Because current Texas election practices and procedures are inconsistent, it is not possible to truthfully validate any election result or conduct a legally sufficient ballot recount in the Texas counties where ‘electronic’ voting, without a paper trail, is being allowed.”

“…Secretary of State’s office should cease issuing waivers that instruct county election officials to operate elections unlawfully and in an inconsistent manner across the state.”


We Need You!!!

Contribute and demand adherence to Texas Laws

to restore balance and truth in our elections.



Copyright © 2016, Laura Pressley Election Legal Fund All Rights Reserved. Political advertisement paid for by Laura Pressley Election Legal Fund, 10203 Woodglen Cove, Austin, Texas, 78753, Fidel Acevedo, Treasurer.  This campaign has not agreed to comply with the contribution and expenditure limits of the Austin Fair Campaign Chapter.

Contact at www.PressleyForAustin.com 

3 responses

  1. Senator_Blutarsky

    It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.
    Joseph Stalin

    Election fraud “, and “voting irregularities”…………..nothing new even at the county level.

    Such just lends more credence to a 2-term limit for any elected “official” and after such, forever forbidden from holding another “government” job in any capacity. Even down to precinct chairman or county chairman of any political party. And most certainly for any paid position. County judges, commissioners, JPs, sheriffs, elected clerks…………..anyone and everyone.

    Things just get to be a bit too cozy, when the same elected-appointed hacks retain office and the natural politically-incestuous tendencies to stay in power, move the will of the people further out of the picture.

    Electronic voting machines and their hackable data have reached epic proportions of suspicion and confirmation. I suspect 2-3 elections in Parker County may have been subject to such over the last decade, truth be known.

    Think George Parr-Box 13-Landslide Lyndon on steroids.




    The Akron Beacon Journal is reporting that the private plane of the GOP’s highly-placed “IT guru” Mike Connell’s went down in Lake Township, Ohio on Friday evening. Connell was killed in the crash and is reported to have been the only person on board. There are no reports of anyone on the ground being hurt, though his plane crashed in a residential neighborhood.

    Connell is a familiar name to readers of The BRAD BLOG as a key witness in the King-Lincoln v. Blackwell lawsuit regarding fraud in the 2004 Presidential Election in Ohio. That recently revived, long-standing lawsuit led to Connell’s recent deposition on November 3, 2008, the day before this year’s general election. According to plaintiff’s lead attorney Cliff Arnebeck in July, a tipster had warned that Connell had been threatened by Karl Rove, as The BRAD BLOG reported at the time, in an attempt to intimidate him into “taking the fall” for Ohio election fraud not long after a motion was filed to lift the stay in that case.


    “Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government, owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.”
    – Theodore Roosevelt

  2. Senator_Blutarsky

    Here is a more subtle approach to vote “theft”-

    Cruz PACs Paid Talk Radio Insider $8 Million Dollars – Was Money Illegally Used To Buy Talk Host Endorsements?


    Reality Check has already shown how “Neutral” Conservative News Websites Breitbart and The Daily Wire are actually fronts for the Ted Cruz Campaign. In our article “The $25 Million Dollar Trump Take Down” we clearly show that the owners of those sites donated over $25 Million Dollars to the Cruz Campaign and then use their websites to promote him. But is Talk Radio also on the take? Reality Check dug into Cruz FEC Filings and discovered the Cruz PACs paid a Talk Radio Insider over $8 Million Dollars, and the endorsements of Glenn Beck, Mark Levin and others quickly came in.

    In other words, if a Talk Show host like Glenn Beck, Mark Levin, Hugh Hewitt or others was paid money by a campaign to talk glowingly, defend or endorse a candidate, and not disclose that they were paid on-air to the audience, or the radio stations they are broadcast on, they’d be in violation of the law. The station could lose it’s license and the host could be jailed and fined.

    Politico published an article in December called, “Talk Radio Rallies Around Ted Cruz” highlighting Glenn Beck, Mark Levin and Erick Erickson, amongst others as hosts defending Cruz and bashing Donald Trump (to Cruz’s benefit). If these hosts are doing it on their own, with no payment, it’s perfectly legal. However, if money is flowing to them, and they are not disclosing it, they are violating Federal Law.

    It’s also been widely reported that, David Barton, the Director of Cruz’s “Keep The Promise PAC”, is also the Chairman of Glenn Beck’s Mercury One Charity. Between January 18, 2016 and February 18, 2016, “Keep The Promise PAC” paid Rigel Strategies, LLC. $1,033,300.00.

    FULL ARTICLE – with display of funds paid


  3. Senator_Blutarsky

    Vote Fraud…………. an excellent read-

    Hillary Clinton is definitely the pick of the Democrats (who were quietly over the years, transformed from patriots to communists). 1984 has finally arrived and the dumbed down American people don’t seem to realize elections today are meaningless exercises in motions with the winners picked by the power elites long before election day. What brought Jon Christian Ryter’s Conservative World to the limelight in 1997 was my publishing (on the not well read AOL subdomain website I had at that time) the Election results for the Election of 2000. I published the winners and losers (both presidential and vice presidential candidates). I later learned that several people on the Hill who knew me, or knew my name, printed off a copy so they could make me eat my words when I proved to be wrong in 2000. Of course, I wasn’t. I was asked by a lot of people how I could have known that, since the candidates: Bush, Cheney, Gore and Lieberman, likely didn’t know they were going to run in 1997, and clearly Gore and Lieberman wouldn’t have wasted millions of dollars running if they positively knew they were going to lose. Particularly when Gore, who seemed to be taking Bush v Gore in stride before the high court ruled, when asked why he wasn’t worried about the lawsuit, arrogantly asserted, “Because I am destined to be the leader of the free world.”

    At the time I posted the article I received a lot of replies from readers telling me who they THOUGHT would run, and win. To each email I replied I was not telling them who I thought was going to run, and win, but rather, I was telling them who was going to win and who was going to lose. Yes, the system is rigged.

    Because of the “chad dance” which was the finale of the vote counting in Florida in 2000, George W. Bush signed an unconstitutional piece of legislation into law–HAVA (the Helping America Vote Act) which required every State to use electronic voting machines. The Constitution mandates that the States alone determine how votes are cast. The federal government cannot mandate that States surrender the paper ballot and #2 pencil, in which the actual paper ballots were counted–which it did. For that matter, the Constitution also mandates that ALL VOTES FOR PRESIDENT WILL BE CAST IN ONE DAY, and that day is specified by Congress. Early voting is unconstitutional.

    As a result today, electronic voting machine fraud “elected” the man in the White House in both 2008 and 2012–and will elect Hillary Clinton with about 40 million fake electronic votes programmed into the voting machines added to the 30 million legitimate votes she will get this November unless the States return to paper ballots and #2 pencils. Why? Because you can’t steal 35, 36 or 40 million fake votes when there has to be a ballot in the ballot box and the number of ballots need to agree with the number of voters who “signed in” to vote that day. Ballot stuffing is usually a local event done to elect a Congressman or Senator, and major problems with “voting the dead” is usually done only in states controlled by the union bosses. (That type of fraud can’t be proven since there is a “signed in” vote for each vote counted.)

    Here are the actual election results for 2008 and 2012.
    http://www.jonchristianryter.com/Two_Cents/2cworth.091128.html (2008)
    http://www.jonchristianryter.com/Two_Cents/2cworth.121126.html (2012)

%d bloggers like this: