GOP, media put White House on sequester defensive

Neil Munro, From The Daily Caller, 5:50 PM 02/27/2013 –

Obaba_sequesterGOP leaders and PR officials are slamming the ’s effort to shield itself from the  decision to release hundreds of illegal immigrants from federal jail, even prior  to the arrival of the sequester budget trims.

Late Wednesday afternoon, the GOP criticism stepped up their criticism of the  jailhouse release, and skeptical reporters began pressing administration  officials to justify their threats to various high-profile programs.

“This was a [release] decision made by career officials … without any input  from the White House,” White House spokesman Jay Carney claimed during the  midday press conference.

Carney reiterated the point a few moments later. “This was a decision made by  career officials at ICE, without any input from the White House, as a result of  fiscal uncertainty over the continuing resolution, as well as [the] possible  sequester,” he insisted.

GOP flacks were unsympathetic; “1) President says he’ll let criminals loose  bc of #sequester 2) His DHS does so 3) He says he knows nothing about it,” said  tweet from Rory Cooper, a spokesman for House Majority Leader Eric Cantor.

“One person has this control?” he tweeted later. “It’s ok folks. President  Obama will be answering questions about the criminal release on The View next  week,” he added.

Cooper also compared the release to other White House scandals, where  officials denied knowledge or a role in the problems. “We didn’t know about Fast  and Furious. We didn’t know about Benghazi. We didn’t know about criminal  release,” Cooper said.

Top Hill Republicans continue to highlight the controversial release.

“This decision reflects the lack of resource prioritization within the  Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement and is  indicative of the Department’s weak stance on national security,” said a  statement from Rep. Michael McCaul, the chairman of the Homeland Security  Committee.

The White House’s backpedaling comes as more reporters in establishment media  outlets are highlighting the White House’s effort to maximize  concern about the pending budget cuts, which will leave the federal budget  very close to the 2012 level.

Amid the skeptical pushback from the media, White House officials, including  Obama, have begun saying the impact of the budget cuts will not be felt  immediately.

On Wednesday, for example, Education Secretary Arne Duncan said the impact  will not be felt for a few months.

“All of those cuts I walked through — the early childhood piece, the K-12  piece, the higher ed piece — those are all cuts that would be hitting in the  fall,” he told reporters at Carney’s midday press conference. “Over the next  month or two you’ll see lots of pink slips go out. … It’s usually March and  April where that happens, but these are all things that would happen for the  fall.”

The sequester is expected by the Congressional Budget office to nick the  government’s $3.8 trillion budget by $42 billion between March and October.  Overall, that’s a cut of 1.2 percent. But because entitlement programs are  excluded it will trim 2013 spending and program starts at the Pentagon and  numerous agencies by roughly 5 percent.

Midday Feb. 27, The Washington Post article debunked Duncan’s claim that teachers  are already getting the pink-slips because of the sequester cuts.

“When he was pressed in a White House briefing Wednesday to come up with an  example, Duncan named a single county in West Virginia and acknowledged, ‘whether it’s all sequester-related, I don’t know,’” said the Post article.

“Apparently sky is not falling — Teacher pink slips claim by Duncan not  backed by evidence,” said a tweet from Sean Spicer, communications director at  the Republican National Committee.

Similarly, a CNN report quizzed Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack about his  agencies’ plans to trim $2 billion from its annual budget of $155 billion.

“We don’t have the capacity or flexibility … there is no wiggle room,” to  target the cuts, Vilsack claimed. Fraud on the department’s foot-stamp programs  is already down to 1 percent, he claimed.

Follow Neil on Twitter

Read more:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: