Chicago Police Chief: Second Amendment Is A Danger To Public Safety

Chicago_murderFrom, By: Dana Loesch, February 17th, 2013 – Chicago’s Chief of Police, who previously blamed ”government-sponsored racism” and Sarah Palin for Chicago’s gun violence, declared that the law-ful exercise of the Second Amendment was a threat to public safety. From the Illinois State Rifle Association:

Chicago’s embattled police superintendent dug himself deeper into a pit of controversy today by claiming that lawful firearm owners are agents of political corruption.  Appearing on a Chicago Sunday morning talk show, superintendent Garry McCarthy expressed his conviction that firearm owners who lobby their elected representatives or who donate money to political campaigns are engaged in corruption that endangers public safety.  McCarthy went on to express his belief that judges and legislators should rely on public opinion polls when interpreting our Constitution.

After totally dismissing the citizen’s right to redress grievances, McCarthy trained his constitutional wisdom on the 2nd Amendment.  Despite recent court decisions to the contrary, McCarthy opined that the 2ndAmendment limits citizens to owning smooth-bore muskets.  McCarthy went on to say that he believes that the 2nd Amendment supports mandatory liability insurance for firearm owners and the mandatory application of GPS tracking devices to civilian owned firearms.

“ Garry McCarthy ’s understanding of our Constitution barely qualifies him as a meter maid, never mind the chief of the nation’s third largest police department,” commented ISRA Executive Director Richard Pearson .  “What on earth would possess McCarthy to assert that constitutional rights should be meted out based on public opinion polls?  Let’s not forget that public opinion polls once opposed a woman’s right to vote while it would be a safe bet that, at one time, polls would have shown lynching as an acceptable form of justice.  It has been said that our Constitution exists to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority.  McCarthy’s view of our Constitution is dangerous and unbecoming of a civil servant.”

“McCarthy needs to understand that the lawful firearm owners of this state will continue to lobby their representatives and continue to support candidates who represent their interests,” continued Pearson.  “If Garry McCarthy doesn’t like that, well that’s just too bad.  If McCarthy is so interested in influence peddling, he should pop into some of the gin mills ringing the Illinois Capitol and count the ruddy red noses of taxpayer-funded lobbyists for the City of Chicago.”

McCarthy’s assertion that the Founders limited arms to smooth bore muskets is demonstrably false as well.

McCarthy has previously said that Illinois “does not have strict gun laws” and that stricter laws were needed in order to adequately combat crimes committed by those illegally possessing firearms.

It’s a concerning prejudice against law-abiding citizens from an official who has the authority to arrest and give orders to fire at them.

One response

  1. Senator_Blutarsky

    If anyone needs a poster child for why secession is needed, read the above…these folk have total disconnect to what a free people should seek.

    I, unfortunately, see a disolution of the Republic coming forth. A burgeoning number of our populace (much ignorant of what made America free, great, independent and a beacon of hope worldwide ) seek collectivist solutions. Such was the true intent of the wide open borders policies since the ’80s – dilute the population with the collectivist mentality, and overwhelming numbers who never knew or appreciated why America was unique in history.

    America today, is but a cheap banana republic, with corrupted judiciary, congress, and the lobbyists own lawmakers.

    [Mercantilism is] a system of statism which employed economic fallacy to build up
    a structure of imperial state power, as well as special subsidy and monopolistic
    privilege to individuals or groups favored by the state.

    – Murray Rothbard, The Logic of Action Two [1997]

    I woke up this morning and asked my beautiful wife , “What day is it?”
    She replied, “1984”

%d bloggers like this: