The President’s One-Hundred Seventy Year Old Ideas

From, By , 8 September  2012 –

Karl Marx

As Obama gets closer to receiving his walking papers,  by consent of the governed, he has apparently decided to become transparent, but  not about his policies and their failures.  He appears transparent about  his loathing, showing sensitivity to his critics. His rhetoric today does not  compare to the inspirational tone four years ago.  Instead, he seems nasty,  sarcastic, dismissive and aloof.

Like in the old black & white TV days on the show “What’s My Line,” the  real Barack Obama is standing up.

Maybe this is an indication he is resigned to failing in November.  If  that is true, then it’s reasonable to assume he has decided to go for broke  since he’ll likely lose anyway.

The trouble is the more candid he becomes, the more he reveals attitudes that  run contrary to those held by most Americans. By this neo-transparency, he  reveals his contempt for mainstream sentiment, illustrating how alienated he is  from the majority of people, an odd campaign tactic.

This is surprisingly unintelligent coming from the smartest man in the  room.

To provide an example, consider what he said recently about the Republican  Convention and those participating: “It was better suited to the last  century.  It was a rerun. We’d seen it before. You might as well have  watched it on a black-and-white TV. If you didn’t DVR it, let me recap it for  you. Everything is bad, it’s Obama’s fault, and Gov. Romney is the only one who  knows the secret to creating jobs and growing the economy.”

Although that last bit of transparency is largely true, I had journalism  professors who would have given Obama an “F” for this snarky analysis.   Aside from the clearly sarcastic and juvenile tenor wrapped up in these remarks,  the startling fact is the man really does not get it, or perhaps it’s more  accurate to say he pretends not to get it so as to pander to his shrinking  base.  After all let’s remember Obama’s chief mentor, Marxist Saul Alinsky,  recommended ridicule as the best weapon, urging all community organizers to aim  below the belt for maximum impact.

Well, Mr. Obama, a lot of people are a little nostalgic about the black &  white days.  We think about those grainy images from the first moon landing  in 1969, and get inspired by the “I Have a Dream” speech. We still like old John  Wayne westerns. And we continue to enjoy and appreciate Andy Griffith while we  recall a time when a sarcastic, prideful mean streak was rarely seen and  certainly not celebrated.  People like reruns of things that remind them of  better times, especially in bad times.  We like being reminded of common  courtesy, lower unemployment and higher standards.

For Obama and Friends, those things are so old hat and corny, they deserve to  be ridiculed. If the Republicans had only provided nostalgic escapism they  would have deserved criticism.  There is much in our past no one wants to  revisit: neither should we ignore history’s lessons.  But that is not what  Romney and the Republicans delivered two weeks ago, nor were they mean or  sarcastic or condemning.  What they did was remind us of what made the  nation great,  instead of directing the choir of condemnation, Mr. Obama’s  preference.

Most of us would much rather be reminded of American greatness centered on  liberty and justice for all, with a healthy dose of love for your fellow man,  than be guilt tripped and encouraged to envy and condemn others.  This is  the grim gruel Obama serves up with increasing frequency.

Somebody should tell him it’s no way to have a fireside chat. (Then again,  why bother?  He already knows everything he needs to know.)

Romney and Ryan and the Republicans did more than remind us of what  makes us great, they called on us to take personal responsibility, something  Obama will never do.

He is too busy encouraging Americans to blame shift and attack each other,  deriving his inspiration from even older, discredited sources, like Karl Marx, a  drunk hailing from two centuries back.

Image: Karl Marx, 1875; courtesy of John Mayall; public  domain

Read more:

One response

  1. fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.

%d bloggers like this: