Promises, Promises ~ until the election is over

UPDATE: by Harry Wilfer, April 11, 2012 –

I attended the city council meeting last night for the first, and probably last, time. My impression was that of egoistic little-league politicians who actually believe that Weatherford is some kind of metropolis. And as far as blaisdell goes, I can no longer stand the sight of him! Though he was expressionless through the early part of the meeting, his countenance became that of a scowl when the shelter was discussed. He lied and lied and when that didn’t work, he lied some more. I’m not so sure that much will be accomplished for the citizens of weatherford when the city manager position is held by such a dishonest, insincere and self-serving individual.

There were more lies than I care to relive on this blog, and sharon hayes made it sound as if the volunteers hadn’t been of much value in getting pets adopted in the past. Also, her tone mentioning that volunteers would be allowed back to the shelter in limited numbers tells me that the city could care less if they ever allowed them back. The city would probably be content to do without volunteers except for all the negative press they have so rightly received.

So the city can go ahead and hand pick their butt-kissing ‘volunteers’ (and even place them on the advisory committee – another bureaucratic farce). In the past few months I have been called a liar, lied to, stalled, cajoled, redirected and ignored by ‘officials’ that I wouldn’t trust to empty my garbage cans! This city doesn’t want nor do they DESERVE the volunteers they have had in the past.

It ain’t gonna change, that was quite obvious last night. And even if it were possible to replace the entire city government, the stench of this current one would hang in the air for years to come.

____________________________________

by Harry Wilfer, April 10, 2012 –

With all of the negative publicity that city government has received in news publications and social media you would have thought they would have acted quickly and boldly. Instead the city council apparently waited things out, hoping things would quiet down before election time. Now, however, they are making promises of improvement. Promises of new management, promises of a new volunteer program, promises, promises, promises. It appears to be nothing more than a new political strategy: hold out a carrot until the elections are over.

If the incumbents win, then they can withdraw their plans and go back to business as usual.

Until things at the shelter are actually improved, it’s just a lot of hot air! The promises made a month before the elections could have been made and implemented a month or two ago. For that matter, if officials hadn’t had their heads so far up their butts the problems at the shelter may not have happened at all. All of the incumbents: hooks, hamilton and wilder have to go, then, if they love animals as much as they claim, they will have more free time to volunteer at the shelter they had a hand in fouling up!!!

8 responses

  1. Jack C. Pickard | Reply

    Well said.

  2. Correction…Hooks, Hamilton, and Swancy are up for reelection. We are stuck with Wilder and Robinson for another 2 years.

    1. Is Hamilton running? I thought he was dead ;they named a street or bridge or something for him.

      1. He is running and has plans to raise our taxes as do the others to finance their development of Fort Worth Hwy. A little birdie has said the multimillion dollar Equine Convention Center is going to be built no matter what the cost. Get ready to open your pocket books Weatherford if the three incumbents get reelected. You think the animal shelter is a mess well you ain’t seen nothing after 3 more years of Hooks, Swancy, and Hamilton.

  3. rws (Robert Smith) | Reply

    Until the residents of Weatherford wake up and GO VOTE..nothing will change. In the last city elections 1200 or so people showed up to vote out of 25,000.. Pathetic !

    Ted you are Correct in what you say !!!!

  4. I attended the city council meeting last night for the first, and probably last, time. My impression was that of egoistic little-league politicians who actually believe that weatherford is some kind of metropolis. And as far as blaisdell goes, I can no longer stand the sight of him! Though he was expressionless through the early part of the meeting, his countenance became that of a scowl when the shelter was discussed. He lied and lied and when that didn’t work, he lied some more. I’m not so sure that much will be accomplished for the citizens of weatherford when the city manager position is held by such a dishonest, insincere and self-serving individual.
    There were more lies than I care to relive on this blog, and sharon hayes made it sound as if the volunteers hadn’t been of much value in getting pets adopted in the past. Also, her tone mentioning that volunteers would be allowed back to the shelter in limited numbers tells me that the city could care less if they ever allowed them back. The city would probably be content to do without volunteers except for all the negative press they have so rightly received.
    So the city can go ahead and hand pick their butt-kissing ‘volunteers’ (and even place them on the advisory committee – another bureaucratic farce). In the past few months I have been called a liar, lied to, stalled, cajoled, redirected and ignored by ‘officials’ that I wouldn’t trust to empty my garbage cans! This city doesn’t want nor do they DESERVE the volunteers they have had in the past.

    It ain’t gonna change, that was quite obvious last night. And even if it were possible to replace the entire city government, the stench of this current one would hang in the air for years to come.

  5. Miranda Phillips | Reply

    I don’t know if this means anything to anyone but I have someone that brought kittens / cats to the shelter and was told it was “too full” and the lady killed the animals right then and there in the back of this mans truck. The woman was the one that drives the white county truck and wears the tan pants and I want to say a badge as well. I myself told the man I didn’t think it was legal and he stated he didnt either and was beyond sad and upset with himself for bringing the kittens to the shelter and viewing what happen to them. Sounds to me like SOMEONES BUTT NEEDS TO BE JAILED EVEN IF SHE IS A COUNTY/ POLICE OFFICER. Every animal should have the right to be adopted and if that chance isn’t given what gives someone the right to stab a cat to death in the back of a truck AT THE SHELTER?!!! Because you work for the city…………? Anyone else would be in JAIL….and righty so.

  6. Amy Fortenberry | Reply

    wait…what…. they EUed kittens in the parking lot in front of the person that brought the cats to the shelter in hopes they would help them out? If that is the case PLEASE have them come to the city council meeting tomorrow night so they can give a first hand account of it all to the Mayor and all the others that seem to think that there “isnt anything wrong” with the shelter. They wont listen to hear say but they need to have first hand accountings put on their table. Thank you for speaking out for the innocent animals..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: