An Ordinance enacted by Commissioners Court has become a controversial issue. Some agree with the Court’s decision to limit the right of individuals to use firearms on private platted property that is 10 acres or less. Others view the Court’s action as further erosion of individual liberty.
James Madison, in the Federalist Papers, was one of the first to warn that it is of great importance in a republic not only to guard the society against the oppression of its rulers but to guard one part of the society against the injustice of the other part – Tyranny of the Majority.
We now see a perfect example here in Parker County of what Madison was talking about.
Is there a reason why we cannot simply hold individuals accountable for their actions; not for some abstract theory of what may possibly happen? Do we not already have laws in place for such things as reckless endangerment?
Reckless endangerment: A person commits the crime of reckless endangerment if the person recklessly engages in conduct which creates a substantial risk of serious physical injury to another person.
Why did we infringe upon the rights of many, simply because one person was alleged to have engaged in reckless behavior? If there was “probable cause”, why wasn’t an arrest made? If there was no probable cause, why did we restrict the freedom of law abiding citizens?
What about “due process”? Has that been taken away also? One man (whom I do not know) was only accused, not charged and not prosecuted. Common criminals receive better treatment. Sounds like vigilante justice to me. Tyranny of the Majority is alive and well in Parker County.
The system that was intended to protect individual rights has been compromised. Now unfortunately, rights of many have been restricted by those who swore an oath to protect the rights of all. One exception should be noted. Commissioner, John Roth stood alone in defense of individual rights when he cast a dissenting vote.
One of America’s most cherished symbols of freedom is the Liberty Bell. It is not called the “Peace Bell” for a very good reason. Those who seek peace no matter the costs will tolerate socialism. The price for liberty on the other hand, is never fully paid. I believe peace and liberty are as much opposites as rights and privileges.
In his “Tree of Liberty” letter to William Smith, Thomas Jefferson wrote the following:
Paris, November 13, 1787
DEAR SIR, — I am now to acknowledge the receipt of your favors of October the 4th, 8th, & 26th. In the last you apologize for your letters of introduction to Americans coming here. It is so far from needing apology on your part, that it calls for thanks on mine. I endeavor to show civilities to all the Americans who come here, & will give me opportunities of doing it: and it is a matter of comfort to know from a good quarter what they are, & how far I may go in my attentions to them. Can you send me Woodmason’s bills for the two copying presses for the M. de la Fayette, & the M. de Chastellux? The latter makes one article in a considerable account, of old standing, and which I cannot present for want of this article. — I do not know whether it is to yourself or Mr. Adams I am to give my thanks for the copy of the new constitution. I beg leave through you to place them where due. It will be yet three weeks before I shall receive them from America. There are very good articles in it: & very bad. I do not know which preponderate. What we have lately read in the history of Holland, in the chapter on the Stadtholder, would have sufficed to set me against a chief magistrate eligible for a long duration, if I had ever been disposed towards one: & what we have always read of the elections of Polish kings should have forever excluded the idea of one continuable for life. Wonderful is the effect of impudent & persevering lying. The British ministry have so long hired their gazetteers to repeat and model into every form lies about our being in anarchy, that the world has at length believed them, the English nation has believed them, the ministers themselves have come to believe them, & what is more wonderful, we have believed them ourselves. Yet where does this anarchy exist? Where did it ever exist, except in the single instance of Massachusetts? And can history produce an instance of rebellion so honourably conducted? I say nothing of it’s motives. They were founded in ignorance, not wickedness. God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, & always well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. We have had 13. states independent 11. years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century & a half for each state. What country before ever existed a century & a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is it’s natural manure. Our Convention has been too much impressed by the insurrection of Massachusetts: and in the spur of the moment they are setting up a kite to keep the hen-yard in order. I hope in God this article will be rectified before the new constitution is accepted. — You ask me if any thing transpires here on the subject of S. America? Not a word. I know that there are combustible materials there, and that they wait the torch only. But this country probably will join the extinguishers. — The want of facts worth communicating to you has occasioned me to give a little loose to dissertation. We must be contented to amuse, when we cannot inform.
I believe that “spirit of resistance” about which Jefferson wrote lives on in America today. We need only to be led by a modern day Thomas Jefferson.
We the people will never be a threat to those who govern as long as those who govern respect the unalienable rights of the individual! Liberty and Tyranny cannot coexist!
Jefferson said it perfectly – “When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.”
by Lenny Leatherman