<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Parker County Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://parkercountyblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://parkercountyblog.com</link>
	<description>Texans expressing opinions about issues that are relative to Parker County and beyond.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:37:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ron Paul, Constitutional Scholar by Thewrongrightguy</title>
		<link>http://parkercountyblog.com/2012/02/08/ron-paul-constitutional-scholar/#comment-11782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thewrongrightguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parkercountyblog.com/?p=14448#comment-11782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ron Paul should be in charge of the monetarysystem and if he had the power that the fed now has would there be a dramatic change,  you bet and he would not be printing our money and giving away under the table.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul should be in charge of the monetarysystem and if he had the power that the fed now has would there be a dramatic change,  you bet and he would not be printing our money and giving away under the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ron Paul’s House record marked by bold strokes, and futility by Mark</title>
		<link>http://parkercountyblog.com/2012/02/08/ron-pauls-house-record-marked-by-bold-strokes-and-futility/#comment-11771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parkercountyblog.com/?p=14468#comment-11771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So typical and predictable. 
In trying to defend Ron Paul’s indefensible lack of success, all that is left is to attack Paul’s colleagues and “the mindless writer”(attacking the messenger again). Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results – how’s that working out for you Hmmm? 

I’m outta here! No reason to ponder any more of this …. intellectual discourse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So typical and predictable.<br />
In trying to defend Ron Paul’s indefensible lack of success, all that is left is to attack Paul’s colleagues and “the mindless writer”(attacking the messenger again). Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results – how’s that working out for you Hmmm? </p>
<p>I’m outta here! No reason to ponder any more of this …. intellectual discourse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ron Paul’s House record marked by bold strokes, and futility by Senator-Blutarsky</title>
		<link>http://parkercountyblog.com/2012/02/08/ron-pauls-house-record-marked-by-bold-strokes-and-futility/#comment-11767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Senator-Blutarsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parkercountyblog.com/?p=14468#comment-11767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark

how slow are you, son ? I responded to both you and the mindless writer by challenging your  incorrect use of what defines a &quot;loser&quot; quite clearly.

You seem adept at dodging my question back to you in defining &quot;winners&quot; - The cats who passed GATT NAFTA WTO? - are your proud of them? For the NDAA, Patriot Act, Warner Defense Act, telComm Immunity bill - those &quot;passed&quot; - do your RepubliCON heroes who voted for them and passed them get classified as &quot;winners&quot; because they passed?

What is a &quot;winner&quot; , mark? It is becoming obvious that you do not know, and are evading answering my very pointed, direct, clear and unambiguous question to you.

We cant define loser or winner until we establish that, capiche`?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark</p>
<p>how slow are you, son ? I responded to both you and the mindless writer by challenging your  incorrect use of what defines a &#8220;loser&#8221; quite clearly.</p>
<p>You seem adept at dodging my question back to you in defining &#8220;winners&#8221; &#8211; The cats who passed GATT NAFTA WTO? &#8211; are your proud of them? For the NDAA, Patriot Act, Warner Defense Act, telComm Immunity bill &#8211; those &#8220;passed&#8221; &#8211; do your RepubliCON heroes who voted for them and passed them get classified as &#8220;winners&#8221; because they passed?</p>
<p>What is a &#8220;winner&#8221; , mark? It is becoming obvious that you do not know, and are evading answering my very pointed, direct, clear and unambiguous question to you.</p>
<p>We cant define loser or winner until we establish that, capiche`?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ron Paul’s House record marked by bold strokes, and futility by Mark</title>
		<link>http://parkercountyblog.com/2012/02/08/ron-pauls-house-record-marked-by-bold-strokes-and-futility/#comment-11766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parkercountyblog.com/?p=14468#comment-11766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again – again, instead of trying to refute the facts in the author’s column, you launch an attack on those you consider to be “dumbed-down American voting sheep”.

Oh yes - Senator, we&#039;ve seen 20+ years of your WINNER - no thanks, I think I&#039;ll pass (no football pun intended).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again – again, instead of trying to refute the facts in the author’s column, you launch an attack on those you consider to be “dumbed-down American voting sheep”.</p>
<p>Oh yes &#8211; Senator, we&#8217;ve seen 20+ years of your WINNER &#8211; no thanks, I think I&#8217;ll pass (no football pun intended).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ron Paul’s House record marked by bold strokes, and futility by Mark</title>
		<link>http://parkercountyblog.com/2012/02/08/ron-pauls-house-record-marked-by-bold-strokes-and-futility/#comment-11764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parkercountyblog.com/?p=14468#comment-11764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suppose in one sense we are all losers! We didn&#039;t do enough to avoid the situation we find ourselves in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose in one sense we are all losers! We didn&#8217;t do enough to avoid the situation we find ourselves in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Would Jesus Tax? by Senator-Blutarsky</title>
		<link>http://parkercountyblog.com/2012/02/09/who-would-jesus-tax/#comment-11763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Senator-Blutarsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parkercountyblog.com/?p=14490#comment-11763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doug..........your closing paragraph is a bit confusing. You seem to want to imply that &quot;progressives&quot; and Obamanoids have the lock on taxes. And after you listed this ambitious, virtuous plan-

I wish Christianity did influence Obama’s politics; if it truly did then there would be an end to abortion, bearing false witness, and obtrusive government and would allow for more liberty than ever before. In addition:

• The entitlement mentality would be history;

• We’d yield up a solid Protestant work ethic;

• We’d enforce a tougher immigration policy;

• Our military would be stronger;

• We’d have a balanced budget;

• We’d see a decrease in national debt and an end to prodigal spending;

• We’d have a defense of traditional marriage;

• And we’d revisit worshipping God rather than feckless humans and their stilted and stymied worldviews.

Tell me Doug, how has the Republican Party, especially over the last 50 years, been the antithesis of this, as you seem to imply?

Thanks

I recall Sec of Defense under Bush, flip us the proverbial middle finger when asked about the missing $3 TRILLION in the Pentagon budget............was he righteous and above the scrutiny you want to give to our Marxist, kenyan born illegal alien in the White House?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.your closing paragraph is a bit confusing. You seem to want to imply that &#8220;progressives&#8221; and Obamanoids have the lock on taxes. And after you listed this ambitious, virtuous plan-</p>
<p>I wish Christianity did influence Obama’s politics; if it truly did then there would be an end to abortion, bearing false witness, and obtrusive government and would allow for more liberty than ever before. In addition:</p>
<p>• The entitlement mentality would be history;</p>
<p>• We’d yield up a solid Protestant work ethic;</p>
<p>• We’d enforce a tougher immigration policy;</p>
<p>• Our military would be stronger;</p>
<p>• We’d have a balanced budget;</p>
<p>• We’d see a decrease in national debt and an end to prodigal spending;</p>
<p>• We’d have a defense of traditional marriage;</p>
<p>• And we’d revisit worshipping God rather than feckless humans and their stilted and stymied worldviews.</p>
<p>Tell me Doug, how has the Republican Party, especially over the last 50 years, been the antithesis of this, as you seem to imply?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>I recall Sec of Defense under Bush, flip us the proverbial middle finger when asked about the missing $3 TRILLION in the Pentagon budget&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;was he righteous and above the scrutiny you want to give to our Marxist, kenyan born illegal alien in the White House?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ron Paul’s House record marked by bold strokes, and futility by Senator-Blutarsky</title>
		<link>http://parkercountyblog.com/2012/02/08/ron-pauls-house-record-marked-by-bold-strokes-and-futility/#comment-11760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Senator-Blutarsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parkercountyblog.com/?p=14468#comment-11760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Be careful about tossing around the term “loser”.

BTW, mark – who are the “winners” in Congress? those who authored the Patriot Act? the TARP bailouts? Medicare Prescription Plan(Obamacare 1 ), those who passed NAFTA, GATT, WTO?……….I guess those are YOUR “winners”, huh ?

who are WINNERS mark ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful about tossing around the term “loser”.</p>
<p>BTW, mark – who are the “winners” in Congress? those who authored the Patriot Act? the TARP bailouts? Medicare Prescription Plan(Obamacare 1 ), those who passed NAFTA, GATT, WTO?……….I guess those are YOUR “winners”, huh ?</p>
<p>who are WINNERS mark ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ron Paul’s House record marked by bold strokes, and futility by Mark</title>
		<link>http://parkercountyblog.com/2012/02/08/ron-pauls-house-record-marked-by-bold-strokes-and-futility/#comment-11756</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parkercountyblog.com/?p=14468#comment-11756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again - again, instead of trying to refute the facts in the author’s column, you launch an attack on those you consider to be “dumbed-down American voting sheep”.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again &#8211; again, instead of trying to refute the facts in the author’s column, you launch an attack on those you consider to be “dumbed-down American voting sheep”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ron Paul’s House record marked by bold strokes, and futility by Senator-Blutarsky</title>
		<link>http://parkercountyblog.com/2012/02/08/ron-pauls-house-record-marked-by-bold-strokes-and-futility/#comment-11755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Senator-Blutarsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parkercountyblog.com/?p=14468#comment-11755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark.............let me tell you a football story.

One of the very best quarterbacks I ever watched was Archie Manning of the New Orleans Saints, back in the &#039;70s. A tremendous, passer, deft runner, clever play-caller, tough, resilient...........a winner in every way.

Except on the scoreboard.

While Manning was QB there, the teams were awful. Archie had a last-place bunch of teammates, not All-Pros. Archie could almost do it himself, but he needed some better blockers, better receivers, better running backs, and a defense that would keep a game in reach.

Archie never had that while an NFL QB.

Sometimes, one cant count on much help, when surrounded by a lousy bunch of teammates. It made Archie no less a &quot;winner&quot; and in peers observations, the consummate professional. One can only wonder how many championship rings he might have, given a decent team.

Be careful about tossing around the term &quot;loser&quot;.

BTW, mark - who are the &quot;winners&quot; in Congress? those who authored the Patriot Act? the TARP bailouts? Medicare Prescription Plan(Obamacare 1 ), those who passed NAFTA, GATT, WTO?..........I guess those are YOUR &quot;winners&quot;, huh ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.let me tell you a football story.</p>
<p>One of the very best quarterbacks I ever watched was Archie Manning of the New Orleans Saints, back in the &#8217;70s. A tremendous, passer, deft runner, clever play-caller, tough, resilient&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..a winner in every way.</p>
<p>Except on the scoreboard.</p>
<p>While Manning was QB there, the teams were awful. Archie had a last-place bunch of teammates, not All-Pros. Archie could almost do it himself, but he needed some better blockers, better receivers, better running backs, and a defense that would keep a game in reach.</p>
<p>Archie never had that while an NFL QB.</p>
<p>Sometimes, one cant count on much help, when surrounded by a lousy bunch of teammates. It made Archie no less a &#8220;winner&#8221; and in peers observations, the consummate professional. One can only wonder how many championship rings he might have, given a decent team.</p>
<p>Be careful about tossing around the term &#8220;loser&#8221;.</p>
<p>BTW, mark &#8211; who are the &#8220;winners&#8221; in Congress? those who authored the Patriot Act? the TARP bailouts? Medicare Prescription Plan(Obamacare 1 ), those who passed NAFTA, GATT, WTO?&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.I guess those are YOUR &#8220;winners&#8221;, huh ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ron Paul, Constitutional Scholar by Al Lee for Congress</title>
		<link>http://parkercountyblog.com/2012/02/08/ron-paul-constitutional-scholar/#comment-11752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Lee for Congress]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parkercountyblog.com/?p=14448#comment-11752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are probably right. It is probably just a coincidence that they used the word &quot;Sustainable&quot; in the Soros-dominated task force and that Soros is involved with Agenda 21 which also, by some coincidence, likes that word. 

I can fully understand that you would not vote for or support me. Making that sort of unproven connection just based on such flimsy circumstantial evidence is unforgivable. I am going to reexamine my decision to run. 

Thank you for pointing that out to me.

Maybe I can reform my thinking and get myself on a Soros project to, say, move all military contracting to China or to Brazil so as to increase our national security and then I will meet with the approval of thinking voters. I guess I have been unduly influenced by that old, outdated Reagan maxim: &quot;Peace Through Strength&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are probably right. It is probably just a coincidence that they used the word &#8220;Sustainable&#8221; in the Soros-dominated task force and that Soros is involved with Agenda 21 which also, by some coincidence, likes that word. </p>
<p>I can fully understand that you would not vote for or support me. Making that sort of unproven connection just based on such flimsy circumstantial evidence is unforgivable. I am going to reexamine my decision to run. </p>
<p>Thank you for pointing that out to me.</p>
<p>Maybe I can reform my thinking and get myself on a Soros project to, say, move all military contracting to China or to Brazil so as to increase our national security and then I will meet with the approval of thinking voters. I guess I have been unduly influenced by that old, outdated Reagan maxim: &#8220;Peace Through Strength&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
